Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kris Van Wyk vs James Beaven Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wyk vs Beaven analysis and find out who is favored!
Kris Van Wyk vs James Beaven Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wyk 0 - 0 Beaven
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wyk has won 49.05% of points on their second serve, while Beaven has won 48.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wyk, in recent form, has won 53.43% of their opponent's second serve points, while Beaven has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.33% and 29% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wyk has saved 54.52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Beaven has saved 48.28% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wyk has won 64.42% of matches played (W/L 67/ 37), with Beaven winning 33.33% (W/L 12/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wyk has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 155/ 85), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Beaven has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 16/ 24), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Wyk has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.66% of matches (W/L 65/ 34), where as Beaven has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 12/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wyk has played against opponents with an average rank of 110.98 while Beaven has played against players with an average rank of 42.78.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wyk has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Beaven has won 17% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wyk has converted 47.13% of breakpoint opportunities, and Beaven has converted 48.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
385
Rank
365
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
Form
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
64% (156-87)
Career Total W/L
36% (19-34)
64% (34-19)
YTD W/L
36% (8-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Kris Van Wyk vs James Beaven For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Wyk VS Beaven
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kris Van Wyk | James Beaven |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (34/19) | 36% (8/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (74/51) | 42% (20/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (629/530) | 45% (195/234) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (34/19) | 40% (8/12) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.48 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 269 | 25 |
| DFs per game | 0.43 | 0.08 |
| DFs Total | 246 | 16 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 116.74 | 70 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (2151/3617) | 60% (295/491) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (1478/2151) | 63% (187/295) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (719/1466) | 48% (95/196) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (205/435) | 48% (16/33) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1659/3803) | 37% (171/468) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 65% (32/17) | 36% (8/14) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (33/52) | 36% (8/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 46% (6/13) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 65% (13/20) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 96% (27/26) | 73% (11/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 4% (27/1) | 27% (11/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (26/7) | 0% (11/0) |
Kris Van Wyk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Luc Koenig
56%
(
51 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
6
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
5
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luc Koenig
Player
Kris Van Wyk
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
95)
5
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
7
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Egor Agafonov
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
10
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
19%
(
4 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Manish Sureshkumar
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Paulo Andre Saraiva Dos Santos
47%
(
29 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
0
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Niklas Schell
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
99)
9
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
74%
(
25 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
19 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Tianhui Zhang
51%
(
45 of
88)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
13
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Gorokhov
Player
Kris Van Wyk
79%
(
109 of
138)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
102)
1
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
7
58%
(
63 of
109)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
42%
(
58 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
119
Total Points Won
121
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Khazime
Player
Kris Van Wyk
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Mousa Alkotop
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
James Beaven Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
James Beaven
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Beaven
Player
Adrian Arcon
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
45%
(
35 of
77)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Beaven
Player
Luke Oosthuizen
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
78%
(
28 of
36)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ishaque Eqbal
Player
James Beaven
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
55
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 2-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Enzo Wallart
Player
James Beaven
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
26 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
69
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
James Beaven
Player
Zachary Fuchs
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Wyk Vs Beaven Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Wyk are available here and Beaven photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Kris Van Wyk
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
